What is Site-Visit Tracking in Real Estate Development?
TL;DR
- Site-visit tracking is the operational record of every prospect visit to a showflat, sales gallery or under-construction unit — captured at the moment of visit and linked to the buyer record.
- It matters because site visits are the highest-conversion step in off-plan sales: a typical site-visit-to-booking rate is 15–25%, against 1–3% for cold leads.
- Modern platforms tie the visit to a deal record, an agent, a unit shortlist and a follow-up trigger — so the next interaction isn't a cold restart.
Quick facts
- Site-visit-to-booking rate
- 15–25% for off-plan, 30%+ for completed inventory
- Typical visits before booking
- 1.4 (off-plan), 2.7 (luxury / villa)
- Required fields per visit
- Date, agent, units shown, feedback, next action
- Cost of an unrecorded visit
- Lost attribution → broken commission claim
Why track site visits separately from leads?
A lead is intent; a site visit is investment of time. Conflating them in one record loses the signal — you can't tell which agent did the in-person work, which units were actually presented, or whether feedback after the visit shifted the buyer's preferences. Tracking them separately gives you the conversion ladder: lead → site visit → offer → booking → deal, with rates at each step.
What fields belong on a site-visit record?
The minimum useful set: date and time, attending agent (and any channel-partner present), units presented during the visit, buyer's recorded feedback, next-action commitment with a date. Optional but valuable: which marketing assets were shown (renders, masterplan, payment plan), photos of the visit, and whether the buyer brought a decision-maker (spouse, parent, financial advisor).
- Date and time — required for attribution and SLA reporting.
- Attending agent — locks the commission claim against this visit.
- Units presented — feeds the recommendation engine for the next offer.
- Buyer feedback — short free-text + structured tags (price, layout, location).
- Next-action commitment — what the agent promised to send / call about, with a deadline.
How does site-visit tracking tie into commission disputes?
In off-plan, the commission-claim chain almost always starts at a site visit. If the visit isn't logged, the agent has no documented evidence they did the work — and channel-partner disputes ("I sent that buyer first") become impossible to arbitrate. A platform-side visit log with a timestamp and the attending agent's signature (digital, automatic) is the single best protection against retrospective commission challenges.
How DomusHub handles site-visit tracking
DomusHub treats a site visit as an event attached to the client record, the unit shortlist and the attending agent — not a free-text note in a generic CRM. The visit feeds the next interactive offer the agent builds; the buyer sees the units actually presented, with personalised blocks. Commission claims trace back to the recorded visit.
- Visit logged in the client's timeline with date, agent and units presented.
- Units presented during the visit pre-populate the next interactive offer.
- Next-action commitment with a date triggers a notification to the agent.
- Agent's site-visit log doubles as evidence for commission-claim disputes.
Frequently asked questions
How many site visits does an off-plan buyer typically make?
Should we log virtual / video tours as site visits?
What's the right SLA between site visit and follow-up?
Related terms
All glossary terms
See how DomusHub handles site visits in production
Live demo on your own data within 24 hours of request.
Request a demo